As of June 2023, ChatGPT boasts an estimated user base of 100 million. Approximately 12.31% of these users are based in the United States, and 59.67% identify as male. Although ChatGPT is regarded as one of the most advanced AI systems in the world today, many people harbor concerns about the ethical considerations surrounding its use and the potential for abuse.
Humanity has historically been ill-prepared to handle the advent of new technologies responsibly, often mismanaging their integration into society. This pattern is evident in our experiences with the internet, nuclear technology, and automobiles. On each occasion, we were substantially unprepared for the repercussions of these emerging technologies. No one could have foreseen how the internet would foster echo chambers that reinforce negative beliefs and behaviors, escalate bullying, and facilitate criminal activities. Similarly, who could have predicted the significant environmental degradation caused by automobile emissions?
However, we are not living in the 1800s anymore. Time and time again, we have learned harsh lessons due to our lack of foresight and preparation. Now, it is clear that when faced with a groundbreaking invention with the potential to alter society on a grand scale, we must engage in thoughtful analysis of the ethical implications associated with it. There can be no more excuses.
Indeed, ChatGPT is a potent tool in various domains, including mental health. It can be employed to cross-reference new research, assist clinicians in developing handouts, and offer resources for clients. Another innovative application of ChatGPT is in conflict resolution. Clients who struggle with setting boundaries can utilize ChatGPT to structure their thoughts and draft emails or texts that effectively communicate their needs and boundaries. This can alleviate the stress of confronting someone directly, allowing individuals extra time to process their thoughts and feelings.
Here is a quick example on how ChatGPT can be used for conflict resolution.
In this example, I simply input the following “write an email letting someone know they made me feel uncomfortable and i need space from them. use a respectful yet assertive tone”. ChatGPT wrote the following:
_____________________________________________________________________________
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to discuss something that has been on my mind. In our recent interactions, there were moments that made me feel uncomfortable. It's essential for me to communicate my feelings, as I believe open dialogue fosters understanding and growth.
I understand that we all have different perspectives and what might be normal for one person might be uncomfortable for another. That said, I find it necessary to take a little break and give myself some space to reflect and recalibrate.
I want to stress that my intent is not to accuse or alienate. Instead, I believe that by expressing my feelings, we can better understand each other and find a middle ground in the future. I value our relationship, and I think this short break will be beneficial for both of us.
Thank you for understanding. I appreciate your respect for my feelings and needs.
Warm regards,
[Your Name]
_____________________________________________________________________________
I then asked ChatGPT to make this same message into a concise text, and I received the following:
Hey [Recipient's Name],
Recently, some of our interactions made me feel uneasy. I need a bit of space to reflect. Hope you understand, and we can discuss more later.
Thanks,
[Your Name]
_____________________________________________________________________________
As a mental health professional, I stand by these messages. They are clear, and assertive. Two things recovering trauma survivors have trouble with. Therefore, it can be a very helpful tool in developing the language to assert your needs and boundaries.
Its important to remember that ChatGPT is meant to be a tool to assist us, and not a replacement for personal judgement, or human connection. Just as taking medication is meant to assist a client to ‘take the edge off’ enough to do the clinical work and make real change in their mind and body, ChatGPT is meant to assist with the practice of developing new skills. It is not meant to be something to rely on for human judgement and emotional connection.
When using AI to assist with conflict situations, it's crucial to be aware of its limitations. Some of the significant constraints include:
Lack of Emotional Intelligence: AI doesn't have feelings, emotions, or consciousness. While it can detect patterns or keywords related to emotions, it cannot genuinely understand or empathize with human emotions.
Over-reliance: Depending on AI too heavily might cause individuals to abdicate personal responsibility for communication. This could lead to reduced effort in understanding the other person or making amends.
Impersonality: Even with the most advanced natural language processing, AI-generated responses can come across as impersonal or generic, which might not be appropriate in sensitive or deeply personal conversations.
Misinterpretation: AI can make errors, especially when nuances, sarcasm, local idioms, or cultural specifics are involved. What the AI perceives as negative or positive might be different from human perception.
Ethical and Privacy Concerns: The use of AI in personal communications raises concerns about data privacy. If the AI system stores or analyzes personal conversations, there's potential for misuse or data breaches.
Over-simplification: Conflict often arises from complex, multifaceted issues. AI might oversimplify matters by categorizing sentiments or topics in a binary or limited manner.
Bias: AI models are trained on large datasets, and if those datasets contain biases, the AI might perpetuate or amplify them. For instance, an AI might treat certain expressions or cultural references differently based on biased data.
Dependency: Over time, users might become dependent on AI for communication, eroding their own skills in conflict resolution, empathy, and understanding.
Escalation: In rare cases, if not used correctly or if misunderstood, AI suggestions might escalate conflicts instead of resolving them.
Generalization: AI systems are generally designed for broad applicability, which means they might not be fine-tuned for specific cultural, personal, or situational nuances.
Reduction in Genuine Effort: If someone knows that their conversation partner is using AI aids, they might feel that the person isn't putting in a genuine effort to understand or resolve the conflict.
To navigate these limitations, users should:
View AI as a tool, not a replacement for personal judgement.
Always review AI-generated or AI-suggested content for appropriateness.
Be open about using AI assistance when in conflict (transparency can prevent further misunderstandings).
Regularly update and fine-tune AI systems to ensure they're as unbiased and effective as possible.
Be willing to disengage from the AI tool if it seems to be causing more harm than good.
In conclusion, ChatGPT or other AI can be very helpful for resolving minor conflicts. However, for more serious conflicts traditional methods like face-to-face discussions, mediation, or counseling might be more effective than AI-assisted text communication.